Printf("| EXECUTING PC BRANCH - BNE:\n") The registry output must remain the same as when it is returned on MARS and the program counter must increment correctly. I believe this is because when I attempt to change the PC counter to execute the instruction it causes an error. Most of the instructions execute but JR, JAL, BNE and BLEZ are not functional. The issue lies within the execute function of the code. Of course, you still wouldnt be able to see the shadow mask, as its so fine, but the image would be what you seem to be chasing.I've been tasked with programming an emulator to translate and execute MIPS machine code in C.Ĭurrently, the program takes the MIPS code, translates it into binary, and stores it in an array that all currently works. I bet it would make for the unique look you are looking for. Or if a bilinear filter could be added to the line 3x blankline mode that would possibly work too, it just wouldnt be as adjustable as focus on the flyback. It would soften the picture ever so slightly while retaining the thin scanlines. I bet you that a 240p at line 3x mode, with a blank line inserted on the third line would give you the very thin scanlines, and as far as sharpness, it might sound a little crazy, but you could slightly back off the focus pot on the flyback transformer on your 31KHz CRT. Now I kinda wish I could "graduate" from scanlines, but I'm addicted to a sharp picture now, and haven't found a good enough compromise of unnoticeable scanlines sharpness (not to be confused with emulator-on-LCD-like sharp pixels, which I hate). Since the last time I posted here I've reformed my opinion about scanlines. Last edited by Taiyaki on Mon 6:43 pm, edited 1 time in total. Personally I'm not a fan of them as well, which is why I went back to consumer grades and gave up entirely on the bvm and pvm class of monitors. A consumer grade crt is going to have organic looking scanlines either way, and it will be nothing like the scanlines found on BVM's, and frankly the bulk of PVM's as well, due to their all too prominent scanlines from having little to no blooming. Consumer grade aperture grille tv's will also have subtle scanlines. You also could look for pro monitors from the mid to late 80's that have lower TVL counts. I think you would be best getting a consumer TV with an RGB mod, or just a consumer TV in general. It has nothing to do with aperture grill vs. You should probably look for screens with less than 450 TVL. If you hate scanlines then you should be sticking with lower TVL count screens.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |